Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 P2D 511 - Warren v. Hart

Warren v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016

15 state decisions

901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Glading v. Furman · Mentock v. Mentock · Harris v. Grizzle · Leitner v. Lonabaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E)ven if the divorce decree does not mandate support by a parent for the children, the absence of decree provision does not eliminate the intrinsic obligation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"`The duty of parents to provide for the maintenance of their children, is a principle of natural law; an obligation, says Puffendorf (b), laid on them not only by nature herself, but by their own proper act, in bringing them into the world: * * *. By begetting them, therefore, they have entered into a voluntary obligation to endeavour, as far as in them lies, that the life which they have bestowed shall be supported and preserved. And thus the children will have the perfect right of receiving maintenance from their parents.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"`* * * In appraising the sufficiency of the complaint we follow, of course, the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Warren v. Hart, Wyo., 747 P.2d 511, 512 (1987), quoting from Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 [102] 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.