Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

747 So. 2d 1038

Roper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-12-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2002

1 state decisions

Relies on Watts v. State · 686 So. 2d 697 - Larangera v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-12-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation for possession of crack cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest without violence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation which were violated. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Although the procedures followed in a revocation of probation proceeding may be less formal than a full-blown criminal trial, the requirement of a written order of revocation is a mandatory one.”); Larangera v. *1039State, 686 So.2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶2Remanded for entry of a written probation order.

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/747/so2d/1038 · .json · Public domain