Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 SO2D 445 - Ingrassia v. State

Ingrassia v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 637 So. 2d 911 - Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Jenkins · 659 So. 2d 388 - Garcia v. State · 660 So. 2d 778 - Reynolds v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the child victim's hearsay statement because '[t]he record reflects that the court cumulatively weighed numerous potential facts, such as time, circumstances, credibility, demeanor, spontaneity, internal consistency of the individual statements, and maturity of the child'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.