747 So. 2d 475 - Gracey v. Eaker’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Biddle v. Warren General Hospital · 652 So. 2d 360 - RJ v. Humana of Florida, Inc. · 665 So. 2d 1048 - Zell v. Meek · Rojas v. G. Gonzalez Wholesale, Inc. · 691 So. 2d 542 - Green v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would inquire about, and each of the [petitioners] would disclose to him, very sensitive and personal information that neither had disclosed to the other spouse at any time during their relationship. [Petitioners] would disclose this information because they were led to believe, by [Eaker], that such information was necessary for treatment purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“WHETHER AN EXCEPTION TO FLORIDA'S IMPACT RULE SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED IN A CASE WHERE INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL INJURIES RESULTED FROM THE BREACH OF A STATUTORY DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“requirement [of the impact rule] that some physical impact to a claimant ... be alleged and demonstrated before the claimant can recover [emotional distress] damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.