State v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “are those called for in the reference statute.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Dossman · State v. Singleton

2. “Because La.R.S. 40:967(G) allows and requires the district judge to deny parole eligibility only for the minimum terms provided by La.R.S. 40:967(F), the district judge erred in denying parole eligibility for the entire second offender term imposed under La.R.S. 15:529.1(A)(l)(a). State v. Branch, 30,-733, pp. 15-16 (La.App. 2 Cir. 7/6/98) , 714 So.2d 1277, 1287 ; State v. Wimberly, 95-1445, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/24/96), 678 So.2d 577, 580 ; State v. Shields, 614 So.2d 1279, 1285 (La.App. 2 Cir.1993).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 829 So. 2d 1160 - State v. Knight

3. “for not less than one year, without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence, nor more than twelve years.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Singleton