Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lancaster v. State · 600 So. 2d 374 - Burks v. State · 654 So. 2d 95 - McKinney v. State · 531 So. 2d 35 - Maul v. State · 689 So. 2d 916 - Ex Parte Gentry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No party may assign as error the court’s giving or failing to give a written instruction, or the giving of an erroneous, misleading, incomplete, or otherwise improper oral charge, unless the party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating the matter to which he or she objects and the grounds of the objection.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]fford the defendant an opportunity to make a statement in his or her own behalf before imposing sentence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State · R.V.D. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.