Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 SW2D 592 - Faulkner v. Smith

Faulkner v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2020

5 state decisions

3019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 17 Ill. 2d 242 - River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance · 57 Wis. 2d 669 - McPhee v. American Motorists Insurance · Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Houser · Wolford v. Wolford · Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The insurer controls any litigation from which liability might ensue and further controls settlement negotiations. Thus, the accrual of interest may be attributable to the insurer's decision to contest a judgment by appeal. Consequently, it is reasonable to impose the entire expense of accrued interest upon the insurer in view of the company's right to control the conduct of the suit and its power to escape liability for interest through the payment or tendering of its part of the judgment into the court. ". . . [M]any courts have noted that the insurance industry, itself, has always intended that the clause be interpreted to require payment of interest on the entire judgment, even though it exceeds policy limits."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.