Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 SW2D 772 - State v. Elem

State v. Elem’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010

7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Antwine · United States v. Montgomery · United States v. Ingram · State v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he circumstances fail[ed] to raise the necessary inference of racial discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “explanation constituted a legitimate 'hunch,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.