¶1Wife appeals from the denial of her motion to surcharge the personal representative of her husband’s estate. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
747 S.W.2d 776
LaMothe v. Bebee
Decided March 29, 1988
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1988-03-29
Decided 1988-03-29