Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 SW2D 868 - Bachynsky v. State

Bachynsky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2010

1 district · 5 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 160th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Barez · W.D. Yett, Mayor v. Cook · Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. Bailey · Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe Colocotroni

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Representing that goods or services have characteristics, uses, or benefits which they do not have, by representing that Dinitrophenol is a safe and appropriate drug for use in a weight-loss program. Failing to disclose information concerning goods or services which was known at the time of the transaction where such failure to disclose such information was intended to induce the consumer into a transaction into which the consumer would not have entered had the information been disclosed, by failing to advise patients that Dinitrophenol is a highly toxic substance, that it should not be used in a weight-loss program, and that there is no known accepted medical use for the drug.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.