Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

748 A.2d 721

Commonwealth v. Goggins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 2000

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2000-03-09

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Commonwealth v. Mouzon (2002), Merritt v. Blaine (2003)

2 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

380200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

STEVENS, J.,

¶1dissenting:

¶2¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. I agree with the Majority that the trial court abused its discretion in dispensing with a pre-sen-tence report on the basis that Philadelphia county’s prison system would be “overburdened” with state prisoners while awaiting a pre-sentence report.

¶3¶ 2 However, I would find that in this case, a review of the record indicates that there was sufficient additional background information obtained by the trial court with its colloquy with the defendant. On that basis, I would find that the trial court’s decision not to order a P.S.I. report was discretionary with the trial court, and there was no abuse of discretion.

¶4¶ 3 Therefore, I would affirm the decision of the trial court to not order a P.S.I. under the facts of the within case.

/748/a2d/721 · .json · Public domain