Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 F.2d 1142 - Matzker v. Herr

Matzker v. Herr’s Empirical Analysis

748 F.2d 1142 · 1984

Citation profile

197
cited by 197 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

99 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 197 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023 · most notably Davidson v. Cannon (1986), Rakovich v. Wade (1988)

99 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

99019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Bell v. Wolfish · Parratt v. Taylor · Bounds v. Smith · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 197 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An act taken in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally protected right is actionable under Sec. 1983 even if the act, when taken for a different reason, would have been proper.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] pretrial detainee’s due process right to be free from punishment is violated when a jailer fails to promptly and reasonably procure competent medical aid for a pretrial detainee who suffers from a serious illness or injury while confined.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'protects pretrial detainees both from deliberate exposure to violence and from failure to protect when prison officials learn of a strong likelihood that a prisoner will be assaulted.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.