United States v. Roland’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.2d 1321 · 1984
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably United States v. Concepcion (1992), State v. Anderson (1989)
19 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Sansone v. United States · Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · United States v. Grayson · In re Vendo Co. · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the [g]overnment is entitled to show by a pattern of episodes that there was not only predisposition but determination to commit the charged offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may consider even evidence of crimes of which a defendant is acquitted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.