Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 F.2d 276 - Thomas v. Kadish

Thomas v. Kadish’s Empirical Analysis

748 F.2d 276 · 1984

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
September 2007
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Stuart v. Spademan (1985), Narey v. Dean (1994)

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

240198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the constitutional claims presented to a United States district court are inextricably intertwined with the state court’s denial in a judicial proceeding of a particular plaintiffs [claim], then the district court is in essence being called upon to review the state-court decision. This the district court may not do.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “By failing to raise his claims in state court a plaintiff may forfeit his right to obtain review of the state court decision in any federal court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`may be analogized to the function of a special master' in taking actions of an `essentially judicial nature.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.