Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 F.2d 494 - Wing v. Britton

Wing v. Britton’s Empirical Analysis

748 F.2d 494 · 1984

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2021

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

9019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Owen v. City of Independence · Romano v. United States · Buller v. Buechler · Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a § 1983 action, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the defendant, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States____ Thus, in a case where the alleged deprivation is the use of excessive force in the course of an arrest, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant used excessive force while arresting him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.