Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. v. Rohr Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.2d 729 · 1984
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 408 Ill. App. 3d 564 - Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLP (2011), Hydro Investors Inc Lawrence Taft v. Trafalgar Power Inc Marina Development Inc Arthur Steckler Trafalgar Power Inc (2000)
32 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk · Heyman v. Commerce & Industry Insurance · St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South Dakota · Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where sophisticated businessmen engaged in major transactions enjoy access to critical information but fail to take advantage of that access, New York courts are particularly disinclined to entertain claims of justifiable reliance.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f the facts represented are not matters peculiarly within the party’s knowledge, and the other party has the means available to him of knowing, by the exercise of ordinary intelligence, the truth or the real quality of the subjective representation, he must make use of those means, or he will not be heard to complain that he was induced to enter into the contract by misrepresentations.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Danann rule operates where the substance of the disclaimer provisions tracks the substance of the alleged misrepresentations, notwithstanding semantical discrepancies.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.