United States v. Ezeodo’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.2d 97 · 1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2007
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968)
Relies on Patterson v. United States · United States v. Fernandez · United States v. Torbert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hatever the extent of appellant's rights under the local rules ..., in order to prevail appellant still had to make a showing of prejudice, similar to that required by Rule 18.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.