United States v. Causey’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.3d 310 · 2014
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
Relies on United States v. Hoffecker · United States v. Vivit · United States v. Miller · United States v. Kreiser · Thompson v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.