Marsadu v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.3d 55 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Fesseha v. Ashcroft · Mendez-Barrera v. Holder · Sharari v. Gonzáles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless the complaining party can show that the BIA committed an error of law or exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational way,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lin v. Barr“accept[s] the BIA's findings of fact, 'as long as they are supported by substantial evidence,' and . . . review[s] legal conclusions de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lin v. Barr“argument amounts to little more than a challenge to how the BIA weighed the evidence, and, for that reason alone, it is unavailing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Djokro v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.