Ladd v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.3d 637 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Panetti v. Quarterman · Cullen v. Pinholster · Cullen v. Pinholster · Ladd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With respect to limitations in. adaptive functioning, the CCA has explained that ‘three adaptive-behavior areas are applicable to determining mental retardation: conceptual skills, social skills, and practical skills.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.