United States v. Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis
748 F.3d 967 · 2014
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Florida v. JL · United States v. Grubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we pay close attention to the veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge of the informant about the target of the proposed search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficiently particular when it enables the searcher to reasonably ascertain and identify the things authorized to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the description is as specific as the circumstances and the nature of the activity under investigation permit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.