Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 N.E.2d 853 - Perez v. State

Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Loyd v. State · Bieghler v. State · Ingram v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strong presumption arises that counsel rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[flailure to object to the incorrect instruction cannot be attributed to trial tactics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.