Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 P.2d 1084 - Johnston v. Austin

Johnston v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2016

1 district · 6 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ogden v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'n · 8 Utah 2d 272 - Carlson v. Hamilton · Perkins v. Spencer · 21 Utah 2d 289 - American Savings & Loan Association v. Blomquist · State Bank of Lehi v. Woolsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “breach of contract' as a "[vjiolation of a contractual obligation by failing to perform one's own promise, by repudxatmg it, or by interfering with another partys performance' ) 7 . The fact that the Lease does not outline any procedure for providing notice and an opportunity to cure with respect to other types of default further supports a narrow interpretation of the remedy provisions, since a party seeking to enforce a forfeiture provision must give the other party "notice of default and a reasonable period of time in which to cure the default before exercising a forfeiture provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the plaintiffs hald] no legal duty under the contract to provide the sub-purchasers with written notice of acceleration as required by ... the contract”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.