Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 So. 2d 103 - Rochell v. State

748 So. 2d 103 - Rochell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Culbreath v. Johnson · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 735 So. 2d 238 - Hughes v. State · 682 So. 2d 340 - Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will not set aside such finding unless it is clearly erroneous. Put otherwise, we will not vacate such a finding unless, although there is evidence to support it, we are on the entire evidence left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) his statements to the police were involuntary and should have been suppressed; (2) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (3) his convictions for both murder and the underlying felony of arson constituted double jeopardy; (4) his indictment was defective; (5) his right to effective assistance of counsel was violated; and, (6) his guilty plea was not voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial judge saw these -witnesses testify. Not only did he have the benefit of their words, he alone among the judiciary observed their manner and demean- or. He was there on the scene. He smelled the smoke of battle. He sensed the interpersonal dynamics between the lawyers and the witnesses and himself. These are indispensable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.