Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 So. 2d 14 - Broussard v. Duhon

748 So. 2d 14 - Broussard v. Duhon’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 612 So. 2d 107 - Autin v. Terrebonne · Pattan v. Fields · Blackwell v. Kershenstine · 668 So. 2d 1304 - Bradley v. Theus · 621 So. 2d 1139 - Arnold v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant also raised the exception of indispensable party arguing that the Lafayette Consolidated Government had an indispensable interest in the establishment of the boundary line between Lafayette and Vermilion Parishes. In the present case the trial court did not establish or change the parish boundary line, it merely made a factual determination based on expert testimony that Ms. Duhon's home was located in Vermilion Parish.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.