Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Neil v. Biggers · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · McFee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Photographs that are gruesome or inflammatory or that lack an evidentiary purpose are inadmissible as evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“unlimited admissibility regardless of the gruesomeness, repetitiveness, and the extenuation of probative value.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“we consider `whether or not substantial evidence supports the trial court's findings that, considering the totality of the circumstances, in-court identification testimony was not impermissibly tainted' and we will disturb the findings of the lower court `only where there is an absence of substantial credible evidence supporting it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.