Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 748 So. 2d 963 - Eversley v. State

748 So. 2d 963 - Eversley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 881 - Burrage v. United States (2014), Burrage v. United States (2014)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

150199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 440 So. 2d 1242 - Delap v. State · Bradley v. State · United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. · 600 So. 2d 1101 - Nicholson v. State · 581 So. 2d 133 - Riechmann v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A caregivers failure or omission to provide [a child] [an elderly person] [a disabled adult] with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain [a child's] [an elderly person's] [a disabled adult's] physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the [child] [elderly person] [disabled adult]; or 2. A caregiver's failure to make reasonable effort to protect [a child] [an elderly person] [a disabled adult] from abuse, neglect or exploitation by another person.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “causation, the State must also demonstrate that the defendant's conduct was the”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A stabs B, inflicting a fatal wound ; while at the same moment X, acting independently, shoots B in the head ... also inflicting [a fatal] wound ; and B dies from the combined effects of the two wounds,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.