Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 A.2d 1069 - Capital Properties, Inc. v. State

Capital Properties, Inc. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · RI HOSPITAL TRUST NAT. BANK v. Boiteau · Abbott v. Beth Israel Cemetery Ass'n of Woodbridge · Hill v. M. S. Alper & Son, Inc. · Industrial National Bank v. Peloso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court hereby orders the City to expunge all real property tax assessments and reassessments based upon the $110.00 per square foot fair market value as determined in the condemnation proceeding above and permanently enjoins the City from collecting taxes and accrued interest based upon this assessment and reassessment valuation method.” (Emphases added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Assessor’s Plat No. 19, Lot 102: $30 to $110, Lots 103, 105, 113, 114, 118, 119: $75 to ll 10, and Lot 109: $18.75 to $110; Assessor’s Plat No. 4, Lot 247 (246,037 sq. ft.): $20 to $110 and (30,000 sq. ft.): $2 to $10, and Lot 252: $5 to $75.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “14 . Rule 62(a) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure specifically establishes that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.