Marino v. Ballestas’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.2d 162 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2005
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc. · Watkins v. Oklahoma · Chuy 77-1412 v. Philadelphia Eagles Football Club 77-1411 · Gray v. Grunnagle · 220 Pa. Super. 260 - Cooper v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'view all the evidence and inferences reasonably drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the party with the verdict.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the record is critically deficient of that minimum quantity of evidence from which a jury might reasonably [decline to] afford relief.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.