Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.2d 171 - Taylor v. United States

Taylor v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.2d 171 · 1984

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably Haitian Refugee Center v. Meese (1986), Brock v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. (1985)

37 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

380198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2101 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Relies on McQuiston v. Marsh · McDonald v. Schweiker · United States v. Acres of Land Situated in Grenada and Yalobusha Counties State of Mississippi Jg · 551 F. Supp. 327 - McDonald v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because Congress has now made its intent clear, we hold that ‘final judgment’ arises and the thirty day cut-off for EAJA petitions begins when the government’s right to appeal the order has lapsed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he EAJA allows a prevailing party to file a fee petition within 30 days of the final disposition of a case on the merits, i.e. when a party's right to appeal the order has lapsed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive an award under this subsection.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.