Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.2d 203 - United States v. Henry

United States v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.2d 203 · 1984

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

89 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably Mathews v. United States (1988), United States v. Perdomo (1991)

89 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

63019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Hampton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The concern [in entrapment cases] is thus that the accused is not guilty, since he had no criminal intent not implanted by the government, rather than that he is guilty but may avoid the consequences of his criminal conduct because of the government’s undue inducement.” 749 F.2d at 210 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) governmental inducement that might cause one to act criminally where he otherwise would not and (2) the accused's lack of intent, before contact by governmental agents, to commit the crime charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the defendant does not testify, it is not his admission of criminality that triggers the jury's obligation to consider the entrapment defense. It is triggered by the presence of sufficient evidence of inducement and predisposition in the record to raise an entrapment issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.