Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.2d 410 - In the Matter of Madison Hotel Associates, D/B/A the Concourse Hotel, Debtor-Appellant

In the Matter of Madison Hotel Associates, D/B/A the Concourse Hotel, Debtor-Appellant’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.2d 410 · 1984

Citation profile

195
cited by 195 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 195 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc. (1985), In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant (1992)

24 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

6501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 1124 · 11 U.S.C. § 1126 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 305 · 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Di Pierro v. Taddeo · Rimgale Ravenot v. S Rimgale · Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings Ass'n · In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 195 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]or purposes of determining good faith under section 1129(a)(3) ... the important point of inquiry is the plan itself and whether such plan will fairly achieve a result consistent with the objectives and purposes of the Bankruptcy Code.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(7) with respect to of [sic] each impaired class of claims or interests— (A) each holder of a claim or interest of such class— (i) has accepted the plan; or (ii) will receive or retain under the plan on account of such claim or interest property of a value, as of the effective date of the plan, that is not less than the amount that such holder would so receive or retain if the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of this title on such date ...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.