Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.2d 5 - Goney v. Clark

Goney v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.2d 5 · 1984

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Howard v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1991), United States v. 2121 East 30th Street (1996)

16 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Raddatz · Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · Nettles v. Wainwright · United States v. Schronce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “providing a complete de novo determination where only a general objection to the report is offered would undermine the efficiency the magistrate system was meant to contribute to the judicial process”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plaintiff's objections lacked the specificity necessary to trigger de novo review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.