Ewing v. Winans’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.2d 607 · 1984
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2008
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Barber v. Page · Michelson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The limits of cross-examination are within the discretion of the trial court and will be disturbed on appeal only if that discretion is abused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with fundamental principles of liberty and justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harmon v. Hargett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.