United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.2d 623 · 1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2014
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · United States v. Mers · United States v. Stafford · United States v. Varella · United States v. Severdija
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court of records has been deemed to speak only through its records, and thus '[a]s a general rule, an order granted on a motion should, in order to become complete and effective, be entered, filed, or made a part of the minutes or record of the court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is officially filed by the clerk of the court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“delay resulting from any pretrial motion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.