United States v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.2d 628 · 1984
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably United States v. Perez-Tosta (1994), United States v. Hawkins (1990)
24 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Bates v. State Bar · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Johnson v. United States · Abujasen v. United States · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the witness and his company had neither prepared the certificate nor had first-hand knowledge of the preparation does not contravene Rule 803(6).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the person who actually prepared the documents need not have testified so long as other circumstantial evidence and testimony suggest their trustworthiness....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a fair opportunity to meet the statements”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.