Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.2d 84 - Dyer v. Ponte

Dyer v. Ponte’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.2d 84 · 1984

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
December 2006
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2006

15 federal appellate · 6 district ·

160198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Picard v. Connor · Cupp v. Naughten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Cjounsel would be well advised in the future not to rely on a passing reference to a constitutional provision without supporting federal argument and without citations to federal authorities.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.