Illinois Commerce Commission v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.2d 875 · 1984
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Glaxo Operations UK Ltd. v. Quigg (1990), Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States (1985)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 28 U.S.C. § 291 · 49 U.S.C. § 10501 · 49 U.S.C. § 11501
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · United States v. Bass · Jones v. Rath Packing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not necessary to carry out the transportation policy of [49 U.S.C. § 10101a],” and is either”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(b)(1) A state authority may only exercise jurisdiction over intrastate transportation provided by a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission under subchapter I of chapter 105 of this title if such State authority exercises such jurisdiction exclusively in accordance with the provisions of this subtitle. (2) Within 120 days after the effective date of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, each State authority exercising jurisdiction over intrastate rates, classifications, rules, and practices for intrastate transportation described in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall submit to the Commission the standards and procedures (including timing requirements) used by such State authority in exercising such jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“as many as possible of the Commission's restrictions on changes in prices and services by rail carriers will be removed [through the use of section 10505] and that the Commission will adopt a policy of reviewing carrier actions after the fact to correct abuses of market power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.