Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.3d 1212 - Frost v. Pryor

Frost v. Pryor’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.3d 1212 · 2014

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] state court's application of federal law is only unreasonable if 'all fairminded jurists would agree the state court decision was incorrect.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Critically, an ' unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “To make a credible showing of actual innocence, a petitioner must support his allegations of constitutional error with new reliable evidence—whether it be exculpatory scientific evidence, trustworthy eyewitness accounts, or critical physical evidence—that was not presented at trial. This new evidence must be sufficient to show that it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted the petitioner in the light of the new evidence. This standard is demanding and permits review only in the extraordinary case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.