Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 F.3d 192 - Carman v. Carroll

Carman v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

749 F.3d 192 · 2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Graham v. Connor · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allows officers without a warrant to knock on a resident's door or otherwise approach the residence seeking to speak to the inhabitants, just as any private citizen might.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “requires that police officers begin their encounter at the front door, where they have an implied invitation to go.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “which in most circumstances is the front door.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.