Davidson v. Howe’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.3d 21 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Powell v. McCormack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will find waiver only where stated 'by the most express language or by such overwhelming implications from the text as [will] leave no room for any other reasonable construction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parente v. Lefebvre“Congress may abrogate the States' constitutionally secured immunity from suit in federal court . . . by making its intention unmistakably clear in the language of the statute,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“interest in attorney's fees is . . . insufficient to create an Article III case or controversy where none exists on the merits of the underlying claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.