Tyler v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
749 F.3d 499 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Gonzalez v. Crosby · 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attack[ed] the federal court's previous resolution of [his] claim on the merits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Banister v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.