749 F. Supp. 2d 580 - Beebe v. Birkett’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Pearson v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“insufficient to sustain a constitutional violation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Maye v. Klee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.