Morales v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Alabama v. Bozeman · Dickerson v. State · Overstreet v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supported by substantial independent evidence of guilt which satisfies the reviewing court that there is no substantial likelihood the challenged evidence contributed to the conviction.... The court must find that the error did not contribute to the verdict, that is, that the error was unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered on the issue in question.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State · Wright v. State“[Sltate-ments obtained in violation of Miranda and erroneously admitted are subject to harmless error analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Furnish v. State“A federal constitutional error is reviewed de novo and must be 'harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Furnish v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.