Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 N.E.2d 57 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. State · Archer v. State · 8 Haw. App. 284 - State v. Ferraro · Tedlock v. State · Ballard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, our review is hampered by the fact that the evidence admitted at the trial prior to Harris’ [sic] guilty pleas has not been included in the record pre sented to this court. On the basis of the record before us, neither of Harris’s acts of sexual misconduct was a necessary prerequisite for the other. Indeed, although Harris had sexual intercourse with each of the girls on the same evening and in the same apartment, there was no other connection between the events such that a complete account of one cannot be given without referring to the details of the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “episode means an occurrence or series of occurrences and developments which may be viewed as distinctive and apart although part of a larger or more comprehensive series.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “complete account of one charge [could not] be related without referring to details of the other charge[s]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.