State v. Straub’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · Illinois v. Wardlow · United States v. Watson · Bibby v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“investigation led to a seizure that violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This is an issue of first impression for an Indiana appellate court. 5 As such, we look to other jurisdictions for guidance. The Fourth Amendment provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and ef-feets, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gompf v. State · Kendall v. State“(1) where a suspect is fleeing or likely to take flight in order to avoid arrest; (2) where incriminating evidence is in jeop ardy of being destroyed or removed unless an immediate arrest is made; (B) where a violent crime has occurred and entry by police can be justified as means to prevent further injury or to aid those who have been injured; and (4) in cases that involve hot pursuit or movable vehicles.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Exigent circumstances justifying a war-rantless search exist where the police . have an objective and reasonable fear that the evidence is about to be destroyed; the arresting officers must have a reasonable belief that there are people ... who are destroying or about to destroy the evidence. In such a case, the evidence's nature must be evanescent and the officers must fear its imminent destruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.