Moody v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Woods v. State · Spranger v. State · Anderson v. State · Ben-Yisrayl v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is only where the evidence is without conflict and leads to but one conclusion, and the post-conviction court has reached the opposite conclusion, that the decision will be disturbed as being contrary to law.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State · Walker v. State“that (1) performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on prevailing professional norms; and (2) 'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.