Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 P2D 108 - TWA v. McKinley

TWA v. McKinley’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2024

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

7019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Sufficiency of Initiative Petition in Tulsa · Becknell v. State Industrial Court · American Trailers, Inc. v. Walker · Eslinger v. Cole Grain Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]tatutes will be interpreted in a manner which renders every word and sentence operative rather than in a manner which would render a specific statutory provision nugatory. TWA v. McKinley , 1988 OK 5 749 P.2d 108 Dana P. v. State , 1982 OK 140 656 P.2d 253 Eason Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission , 1975 OK 14 535 P.2d 283”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(12) ‘Permanent total disability' means incapacity because of accidental injury or occupational disease to earn any wages in any em ployment for which the employee is or becomes physically suited and reasonably fitted by education, training or experience; loss of both hands, or both feet, or both legs, or both eyes, or any two thereof, shall constitute permanent total disability.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.