State v. Chugg’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “An appellate court, on principles deeply rooted in the double jeopardy clauses of the Utah and Federal constitutions, and by the very nature of the judicial process itself, may not reassess an acquittal even though the acquittal was made under an incorrect application of the law or an improper determination of the facts. Once a criminal charge has resulted in an acquittal by the trier of fact, the prohibition against double jeopardy prevents that determination from ever again being challenged. It is of no consequence that the determination was made as a matter of law by a directed verdict of acquittal, or as a matter of fact by the trier of fact.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jackson

2. “The label attached to a ruling by a trial judge is not determinative of whether the termination of a criminal prosecution is an acquittal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Salt Lake City v. Roberts

3. “A ruling that constitutes a factual resolution in favor of the defendant on one or more of the elements of the offense is an acquittal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Salt Lake City v. Roberts