State v. Moton’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2014
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Cronic · Douglas v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had the knowledge required to fabricate an accusation against the defendant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(e) The challenge for cause is an objection to a particular juror and may be taken on one or more of the following grounds: [[Image here]] (14) that a state of mind exists on the part of the juror with reference to the cause, or to either party, which will prevent him [or her] from acting impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gotschall“temporary embarrassment of the child vie-tim must ... yield to the integrity of the fact-finding process when an innocent person's liberty is at stake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.